| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « May | Jul » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | ||||
- Canadian Tax (1)
- Cross Border Issues (2)
- Currencies (12)
- Economics (33)
- Energy (3)
- Exchange-Traded Funds (3)
- Fixed Income (10)
- Healthcare (3)
- Immigration (4)
- Inflation (7)
- Investing (18)
- Investment Industry (6)
- Investments (25)
- Investor Psychology (9)
- Markets (15)
- Pensions (2)
- Precious Metals (6)
- protectionism (2)
- Readings (3)
- Real Estate (13)
- Retirement (3)
- Seabank Media (2)
- Tax (9)
- Taxation (30)
- Technical Analysis (2)
- Uncategorized (58)
- World News (2)
- 22. July 2010: Mutual Fund Fees - What you need to know
- 20. June 2010: The Risks of Following the Crowd
- 13. June 2010: Arizona Immigration Targeting
- 13. June 2010: New Bank Overdraft Rule in the USA
- 30. May 2010: E2 US Visa Holders at Risk on Renewal
- 23. May 2010: Beware Principle Protected Notes
- 18. April 2010: Strategies for a Volatile Market
- 17. April 2010: China’s Rules to Curb Property ‘Madness’ Will Take Effect Now
- 6. April 2010: Should I convert my IRA to a Roth IRA?
- 3. April 2010: When is a pension not a pension?
Blogroll
Canadian News
Canadian Tax
Fav Blogs
Immigration
When You Thought it Was Safe -Segregated Funds
Manulife revealed that a probe by the Ontario Securities Commission on whether Manulife provided appropriate disclosure on it guaranteed funds also also known as segregated funds and variable annuity guaranteed products has been initiated.
The probe has to do with whether Manulife provided full and continuous disclosure regarding market risk during last years stock market meltdown but I will take this one step further.
Point one is that even if full and continuous disclosure was provided most investors and one could argue many investment advisers did not and do not understand how these products work. A long-dated “guarantee” 10 years out gives small comfort to a 40% draw-down in the value of the underlying funds held in some of these investment products.
Point two is that these products are very expensive both in terms of ongoing expenses, which are embedded in the fund itself so you do not see them and the commission paid to investment advisers to sell them which is large and I mean LARGE.
Point three is how tying up investment capital in these products severely limits your flexibility if you want to change your investment mix.
In the United States variable annuity products which lure investors in with the “illusion” of safety have been subject to strong criticism for all the above reasons noted.
Caveat Emptor!
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.